<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Andrew Plemmons Pratt &#187; open-access</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.appratt.com/tag/open-access/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.appratt.com</link>
	<description>Learning, teaching, pirates, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 01:51:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>PLoS Sustainability?</title>
		<link>http://www.appratt.com/2008/03/26/plos-sustainability/</link>
		<comments>http://www.appratt.com/2008/03/26/plos-sustainability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 03:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Plemmons Pratt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open-access]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appratt.com/2008/03/26/plos-sustainability/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The more I learn about specific issues within energy and environmental policy&#8211;biofuels, for instances&#8211;the more clearly the complexity of those issues demand reshifting the terms of the debate. Biofuels, for example, aren&#8217;t just about &#8220;energy independence.&#8221; But they&#8217;re also not &#8230; <a href="http://www.appratt.com/2008/03/26/plos-sustainability/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The more I learn about specific issues within energy and environmental policy&#8211;<a href="http://www.scienceprogress.org/2008/02/the-path-to-better-biofuels/">biofuels</a>, for instances&#8211;the more clearly the complexity of those issues demand reshifting the terms of the debate. Biofuels, for example, aren&#8217;t just about &#8220;energy independence.&#8221; But they&#8217;re also not just about renewable sources of energy. There are so many issues interwoven in this one &#8220;<a href="http://www.scienceprogress.org/2008/03/biofuel-warfare/">wickedly complex</a>&#8221; topic&#8211;life-cycle carbon emissions, land use concerns, food prices, agricultural subsidies, fertilizer run off, water management, biodiversity&#8211;that the top-level framework for thinking about biofuels has to be sustainability.</p>
<p>If one other thing is clear about the complexity of the biofuels debate, it&#8217;s that in order to make informed policy decisions, we need more research to understand the problems and their interdisciplinary solutions. Might this work benefit from a prestigious, well-organized and well-supported open-access journal that drove discussion? At least one such journal has been around since 2005: <a href="http://ejournal.nbii.org/"><em>Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Science</em></a>.</p>
<p>But the publication I&#8217;m envisioning would have a little more polish, a little more bravado, and a lot more marketing and community development. Basically, it would have the digital panache, selectivity, and impact scores of a journal in the <a href="http://www.plos.org/journals/journals.php">Public Library of Science</a> family.</p>
<p>Naive, perhaps, to think that a single journal could help drive solutions for debates like those over biofuels? Absolutely. But if you&#8217;ve seen ecologists debate miscanthus crop yields and the attendant impact on Iowa watersheds within the economic framework of the current Farm Bill, then you know that running a provocative publication is the easy part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.appratt.com/2008/03/26/plos-sustainability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

