The work that folks did for #30daysofcreativity continues to astound, weeks after. This fine example of kinetic typography is just one of many, and fitting for the topic of how to get better at being creative. Ira Glass explains why you just have to keep going, even when your initial attempts, or years of attempts, fall short:
Internet Undersea Cables--map from The Guardian (click for original article)
Let’s say you’re reading this in Egypt, or Hong Kong, or London. How exactly do bits and bytes get from this web server (somewhere in California) to your far-flung screen? It’s not satellites or magic, but it is crazy. There’s a wire running along the bottom of the ocean with beams of light screaming through it.
The German literary theorist Walter Benjamin has a line that goes something to the effect of, “There is no document of civilization that is not at the same time a document of barbarism.” Part of what he meant by that is that there is no work of art or industry that does not have structural violence somewhere beneath its cultural scaffolding. To offer a heinously crude example, Romantic poetry is sublime and all, but the money that funded its production was made by landowners who exploited the working poor while their government went about colonizing the world.
As it happens, the British needed an excellent communications system to maintain their empire, so later put a great deal of 19th-century effort and engineering into linking the corners of the Commonwealth with telegraph wires. That was a predecessor of the modern intercontinental fiberoptic cable network, which some private investors were trying to expand in the mid-1990s. Neal Stephenson decided to follow the route of the Fiberoptic Link Around the Globe, or FLAG, cable-laying project from Thailand to Japan and back to Egypt, and he chronicled the adventure, in which he dubbed himself a “hacker tourist,” in a 1996 article published in Wired magazine. It is no exaggeration to say that it is one of the most astonishing pieces of journalism ever conceived.
“” is brilliant business reporting, smart technological history, and savvy storytelling. What’s more, if you have read or intend to read James Gleick’s The Information, this article is a must-read companion. Obviously, these projects were conceived in entirely different decades, separated by billions of websites and petabytes of digital information. But they are complimentary in that Gleick weaves intellectual and scientific history with the industrial archeology of common communications, and Stephenson ties common communications to the industrial archeology of circum-planetary engineering. And by using the somewhat bookish phrase “industrial archeology,” I simply mean “the history of how stuff gets made.” (Simple example: Whether in Washington or London, you’re likely reading this in front of a QWERTY keyboard. Why QWERTY? Not because the arrangement of letters makes for easy typing; rather, because the arrangement prevented early typists from smashing common letters like “a” and “e” with their strongest fingers, a hazard that would tangle the levered arms on early typewriters. Industrial archeology stares you in the face all day long.)
Stephenson honestly wants to know just how people approach the engineering project of tying continents together with cable, and the the answer is more complicated and far more interesting than I first suspected. He explains the approach:
Our method was not exactly journalism nor tourism in the normal sense but what might be thought of as a new field of human endeavor called hacker tourism: travel to exotic locations in search of sights and sensations that only would be of interest to a geek.
This leads to a story that covers subjects ranging from the intricacies of mathematical models used to calculated the curvature of slackened wires trailing 30 kilometers out into the ocean behind specialized cable-laying ships, to the basic mechanics of what happens when those cables run ashore at their terrestrial destinations:
One day a barge appears off the cove, and there is a lot of fussing around with floats, lots of divers in the water. A backhoe digs a trench in the cobble beach. A long skinny black thing is wrestled ashore. Working almost naked in the tropical heat, the men bolt segmented pipes around it and then bury it. It is never again to be seen by human eyes. Suddenly, all of these men pay their bills and vanish. Not long afterward, the phone service gets a hell of a lot better.
And while he does not linger on the economic plight of the laborers who actually dig the holes and build the manholes for stretching the buried cable across southern Thailand, he is straightforward in describing the conditions of the work that builds the Internet:
The manhole-making village we are visiting on this fine, steamy summer day has a population of some 130 workers plus an unknown number of children. The village was founded in the shade of an old, mature rubber plantation. Along the highway are piles of construction materials deposited by trucks: bundles of half-inch rebar, piles of sand and gravel. At one end of the clearing is a double row of shelters made from shiny new corrugated metal nailed over wooden frames, where the men, women, and children of the village live. On the end of this is an open-air office under a lean-to roof, equipped with a whiteboard – just like any self-respecting high tech company. Chickens strut around flapping their wings uselessly, looking for stuff to peck out of the ground.
The story here loops across Southeast Asia and the Far East, back through North Africa, and concludes at the historical starting point for key developments in long-distance communication, southwest England. Simultaneously, Stephenson careens between the mid-1850s, the construction of the Library of Alexandria around 300 BCE, and the (then, as in, 1996) present, linking technological entrepreneurship in a manner more exciting than most comic books:
Everything that has occurred in Silicon Valley in the last couple of decades also occurred in the 1850s. Anyone who thinks that wild-ass high tech venture capitalism is a late-20th-century California phenomenon needs to read about the maniacs who built the first transatlantic cable projects (I recommend Arthur C. Clarke’s book How the World Was One). The only things that have changed since then are that the stakes have gotten smaller, the process more bureaucratized, and the personalities less interesting.
I wouldn’t go so far as to say that building FLAG constitutes a “document of barbarism,” but the insanity of the project sounds something like the modern equivalent of white people barreling across the American West—except the American West is the floor of the ocean, and there are international telco cabals instead of railway tycoons. This of course takes more than a few column inches to capture. The article is nearly 42,000 words long, which Wired must have abbreviated for the print edition—that’s about 70 pages cut-and-pasted into an MS Word document. But if you really like knowing how things work, then I can’t recommend this article more highly.
(H/T: I got to this piece from , where I will likely see many other hundreds of hours melt away chasing good #longreads.)
When I was in 8th grade, I had a successful stint as maker of wooden boomerangs. As in, like, I could take a piece of baltic birch plywood and turn it into an apparatus that would fly back to you in a loping elipse when you chucked it into the air.
So I figured we’d go out with a bang here, on Day 30, and shoot for the first new boomerang since the late 90s. Our story today is one of nostalgia, careful work, and some clever handcraft. Alas, it has a bittersweet ending.
Step 1: Outline
One of the most successful designs from my former career was a straightforward L-shape, slightly less than 90 degrees. So that’s what I sketched out on a quarter-inch piece of white pine about 18 inches wide. (I did not find any suitable plywood in my dad’s shop, but as we’ll see, I should have looked harder.)
Step 2: Roughing Out the Blank
Been a while since I handled a bandsaw, but the feel for it came back pretty quickly and we had a nice-looking blank, ready for shaping on the belt sander, then by hand with whatever tools were close by:
Step 3: Prep for Shaping
When I got to this step, I recalled that back in 8th grade, I had a clever jig that sat in a rotating vice so that I could support the thin blades of the boomerangs parallel to the floor for shaping. So replicating something like that took some thinking. I came up with a serviceable jig that used a framing square to brace the blank. Worked pretty well:
Step 4: Shaping, Stumbling Block
I knew that working with a thin board would be risky. Plywood is considerably stronger at these thicknesses on account of the layers of glue, and the alternating grain of the veneers. Unfortunately, shaping the airfoils on each boomerang “wing” requires hacking away at the wood for a while, and given the orientation of the blank, I was pushing with a jagged metal file with the grain. And as I feared, the wing-in-progress snapped cleanly right along the grain:
Coda
It’s certainly frustrating when a project goes awry, and I didn’t have the time or additional materials to try again today. But the process was relaxing and surprisingly easy to get back into after more than a decade. So while this is the last of , I’m not a bit sad completing this project will have to wait for another day.
Sometimes, the ingredients come together just right, and even a simple dish is delicious enough to make your taste buds ache. That happened around dinner time tonight as I prepared a hearty summer salad-type dish that only works when you have vine-ripe tomatoes on hand:
Tomato, Corn & Bean Summer Salad
2 ears fresh sweet corn; slice kernels off vertically
2 fresh tomatoes, medium; diced
1 can black beans; drain
1 lime, juice squeezed
1/4 vidalia onion (emphasis on the second syllable: vi-DALE-e-yah); diced
salt to taste
+/- 1 tsp cumin
olive oil
Toss the corn in a pan over medium heat with olive oil and salt; cook until warm, then throw in the beans and onion.
Cook until the onion is soft and clear. In with the cumin. While this is cooking you cut up the tomato, and squeeze the lime juice in with tomatoes in a bowl.
When the corn, beans, onion are cooked, toss with the tomatoes and lime juice. Mix thoroughly. Serve at room temperature or slightly chilled.
Kids at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 2009 LBL Daughters & Sons to Work Day (flickr/berkeleylab)
When I told the colleagues and contributors I used to work with through that I was leaving my job to teach, they’d usually assume that I was headed to a science classroom. “I wish,” I’d say, “But I only took one science class in college. I’m not qualified.” I love science, science journalism, and teaching—and I hope someday that I can bring those loves together. For the moment, my work as an English teacher and TFA corps member shares one strong element in common with the researchers I used to edit at SP—a strong belief in the power of data and scientific methods to improve many complicated endeavors, including teaching.
Perhaps I’ll follow through in the future on collaborating with some science educators to design a hybrid course on the history of science for middle or high schoolers. But that’s a post for another time.
This creative project might seem a little self-serving, but it allows me to revisit some work that I’m proud of, and which made me a better writer and editor, which in turn made me a better and more committed English teacher. Moreover, it allows me to explore and reinforce connections between what I used to spend my time on, what I’ve been reading, and what I do now. And in the recent words of Steven Johnson, speaking about where good ideas come from, (emphasis added).
Without further ado, then, here’s a list of some Science Progress Greatest Hits authored, in whole, or in part, by your humble editor, arranged in chronological order (cross-posted under Portfolio):
04-15-10 |
A recent survey demonstrates that many forecasters embrace their role as informal science educators. Ed Maibach says it’s an opportunity to boost public understanding of global warming.
03-30-10 |
A lawsuit argued that patents owned by Myriad Genetics on two genes connected to breast and ovarian cancer stunt genetic research and limit access to health care for women. The ruling said that genes can’t be patented.
03-23-10 |
We can ensure that scientists, engineers, and taxpayers alike get the most out of federal support for basic research and development by taking what researchers know about moving ideas from the lab to the market and linking universities, business, and the government in an effort to grow regional economies.
03-05-10 |
There are intimate connections between the scientific advances that expanded the frontiers of human knowledge and the democratic experiments that expanded the frontiers of human liberty.
02-02-10 |
The budget request for fiscal year 2011 that the Obama administration released on Monday includes foundational investments that will help the United States remain the leader among innovative nations.
12-04-09 |
In yesterday’s Wall Street Journal editorial section, Daniel Henninger took exaggeration of the scandal over emails stolen from scientists at the University of East Anglia to new heights, arguing that the incident undermines the entire centuries-old scientific enterprise. But the column ignores both the current observable impact of climate change and scientific history, and is merely the latest volley in the ongoing conservative war on science.
11-10-09 |
A significant proportion of American women leave scientific careers between earning their Ph.D. and winning tenure-track positions. Many of these “leaks” in the pipeline are the result of decisions to start families. Changes to federal and university policy can stem the losses, say the authors of a new report.
10-21-09 |
Given the Obama administration’s positive approach to science and to human rights, a new CAP report argues that now is the time to craft policies that support collaborations between researchers and advocates that stop atrocities.
09-24-09 |
So who is speaking here, an ethicist, a scientist, or a policymaker? Real talk on the ethics of synthetic biology.
06-23-09 |
Federal funding for biomedical research saves lives. Not only that, but investment in research through the National Institutes of Health stimulates the economy by helping people stay healthy and productive. So says a new report published yesterday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (open access).
06-23-09 |
Will access to our own genetic information make us healthier? That’s the idea, but there’s a lot to learn as we share and interpret it. Meanwhile, questions remain about proper oversight of an industry that blurs the line between consumer and research participant.
06-16-09 |
Is pathbreaking science the product of interdisciplinary groups or the interdisciplinary thinking of foresighted individuals? In a commentary in PLoS Computational Biology, Sean Eddy, a Howard Hughes investigator, argues that “roadmap” thinking from the National Institutes of Health for building teams of specialists to tackle complex problems in modern research is flawed, because it encourages work in the worn grooves of existing, and perhaps outmoded, disciplines.
03-27-09 | <
Yesterday, the Hastings Center, a bioethics research institute, released a statement authored by members of the President’s Council on Bioethics critiquing the Obama administration’s stem cell policy. What the authors failed to explain in either the statement or the accompanying press release is that the current members of the President’s Council on Bioethics were appointed by George W. Bush, and will serve until the charter for the council expires in September. The critique, in effect, is an echo from the past.
Coda
The eponymous title of this post is drawn from the title of one of my favorite SP articles ()—favorite because it’s a great bioethics/policy/history of science think-piece, and because I took a speech written for a talk at the Library of Alexandria and edited it into a real article. The author, Eric Meslin, is also a great guy (and incidentally the former Executive Director of President Clinton’s National Bioethics Advisory Council). Plus how often do you get to write about ideas with names like “Non-Overlapping Magisteria”?
So a few weeks ago, I got invited to beta text a nifty little iPad app called . The developers bill it as the pathway to creating your own Khan Academy. And indeed, the functionality is deceptively simple.
Essentially, ShowMe records screencasts of you drawing on an iPad whiteboard–along with your synchronized narrative. You write or draw and you talk, and it records. Then it allows you to upload the screencasts to a social networking platform. Sort of a YouTube for mini smartboard lessons.
Here’s one I put together on “text features”–titles, headings, images, etc.–that help you understand what you’re reading. This also gets at an element of teaching this standard that I think is really important: text features don’t just help you understand what you’re reading–they’re an entry point to understanding the power of abstracting information ():
This is the first eBook that I’ve read cover-to-cover. The publishers say that they want the books to be short enough to digest on a plane flight from New York to Chicago. (More on their .) Their claim holds up. I plowed through this on my iPad before even getting out of bed for coffee one morning. When I was done, I understood all the important elements of HTML5 that distinguish it from previous web standards. But more than that, I was entertained. Keith is a smart designer/developer and a wit to boot. This is the first technical book on web technologies that has made me chuckle as I read. Here is is discussing the canvas tag, used for real-time vector drawing within the browser window:
One of the first flagship demonstrations of the power of canvas came from Mozilla Labs. The Bespin application (https://bespin.mozilla.com) is a code editor that runs in the browser (fig 3.03).
It is very powerful. It is very impressive. It is also a perfect example of what not to do with canvas.
Since I’ve been teaching for the past year, rather than keeping up with web development, this was a fantastic way to catch up in very little time.
I gave a recent birthday gift that included an iPod nano and the Nike Plus kit that turns it into a little run-tracking GPS device. Here’s the thing: the sensor chip component of the set, which is supposed to fit on your shoe, is a smooth plastic token the size of a quarter (right):
It has no clip, no strap, no hook of an kind. Nike of course sells shoes with a special pocket for the sensor, but if you’ve got another brand of shoes, you’re left with stuffing the chip into your laces. And from there, it falls out onto the ground, rendering run-tracking data into stationary-point tracking data.
This of course, is a problem for duct tape.
On the one hand, you could just tape the sensor to your heel. On the other hand, having a removable pouch that attached to your laces would be nice too. So I made the latter:
And of course, the running around NC is pretty nice. Not really related to the project, but here are the mountains from the front porch, at dusk:
Update (6/27)
Here’s the chip holder ready for running action. Report is that is worked great today:
Picking back up from the bagel project begun last night: here are the bagels rising in the fridge.
They got about 8 solid hours of rise, which is perfect and leaves them ready to float while boiling. You can see tiny gas bubbles under the surface of some of them:
While the coffee is brewing, uncover the dough and ready a big saucepan with boiling water and a tablespoon of baking soda to alkalize the water.
Boiling
1 tbsp baking soda (into the boiling water)
Pre-heat the oven to 500 degrees F.
Boil the bagels 1 minute on each side. While they are off the baking sheets, spray the sheets with cooking oil (vegetable, canola, etc.)–don’t skimp, because the bagels will stick to the pans.
After boiling, move the bagels back to the oiled sheets. They will have that golden bagel color–due to the alkalized water.
Baking
When all the bagels are boiled, put both sheets in the oven and bake at 500 F for 5 minutes.
Trade racks and rotate the sheets after 5 minutes, turning the heat down to 450 F. Bake for another 5 minutes, the get the bagels on cooling racks.
Color should be a golden brown:
Eat
Coffee should of course be done by now. When they’re fresh from the oven, nothing beats just plain butter.
Coda
Crumb should be silky, dough should be salty. Let the bagels cool completely before storing in Tupperware or plastic bags. Will keep fresh 2-3 days on the counter; a few longer in the fridge.
While I did spend a good chunk of the day installing and messing around with Drupal—in preparation for some literacy classroom software I’ve planned to build over the summer—that project is nowhere near ready to share. So it’s back to bagels!
Equipment
The Breadmaster, , is keen on mise en place. That is, having everything ready to go in order to ensure your baking project goes well. So I snapped a pic of what it takes to make bagels:
… though of course I realize now that I’m forgetting the dry measuring cup, the baking sheets, the saucepans for boiling, the baking soda, and the honey.
Mix until it’s all hydrated; cover with a wet towel; let it rise about 2 hours. Should poof up to about double size.
Kneading
To the sponge add:
1/2 tsp instant yeast
0.7 oz salt
3 3/4 cups bread flour (give or take)
1 tbsp honey or malt syrup
water, as necessary
Knead it by hand (will jam up a bread machine) for at least 7-8 min. Check for the “windowpane” effect—stretch the dough out in front of a light source and if you can see the light passing through it in a golden hue just before the dough tears, then you’ve got good gluten formation and you’re done kneading. If not, keep at it.
Dough rounds
Knead the dough until it is silky—”tacky but not sticky” is the usual Reinhart mantra. Tear off pieces about the size of dinner rolls—4.5 oz each. It pays to measure because then you’ll come out with a consistent number of bagels in each batch, and they will be the same size. Eyeballing it can lead to bagels that look the same but cook up into wildly different volumes.
Dough coils into bagels
Really I should have videoed this, since it’s a subtle technique that takes a lot of screwing up to get the hang of. What’s most important here is keeping the dough moist enough that it can stick to itself, but tacky enough that you can roll it out without it sticking to your hands. There’s no real way to describe this; you just have to do it a bunch of times:
Ready for rising and fermentation
The shaped bagels go on trays, then get covered with wet towels to keep moisture in while they rise slowly in the fridge overnight. We’ll be ready for boiling and baking a la manana: